Etymology of concept «significance» in accounting and auditing

Authors

  • Roman Romanovych Kulyk Ternopil National Economic University

Keywords:

significance, essentiality, accounting, audit, judgment, threshold of significance

Abstract

In the article the importance of the concept of «significance» in accounting and auditing is considered. The principle of significance in auditing forms the logical sequence and the relationship between the stages of audit, scope and content of audit procedures, evaluation of results of the collected audit evidences and form of audit conclusion.

It has been proved the incorrect use of the concepts «significance» and «essentiality» in the scientific and academic economic literature.

The different definitions of significance, which are similar in content, but do not give to the accountants practical answers for the question of how it should be applied; it is only recognized that the consideration of some information as significant or insignificant one reflects professional judgment (opinion) of an accountant who is responsible for this report, or auditor, who confirms it. This means that auditors should take a convincing and logical form of judgment as for the level of significance.

It has been concluded that because of the double effect of quantitative and qualitative factors the concept of significance is the complicated one to be used in their work. The attempts to establish a single harmonized standard are useless. In addition, the concept of significance has inherent significant subjectivity: a thing that is essential for one auditor is not that  essential for the other one who can appreciate it as useless one.

Therefore, we can recommend to auditors to be more innovative and use unconventional ways that appear as a result of the introduction of new techniques, rules and regulations in accounting and auditing.

Author Biography

  • Roman Romanovych Kulyk, Ternopil National Economic University

    PhD in Economics, Associate Professor,

    Department of Audit, Revision and Analysis

References

Sokolov, Ja. V. (1985). Istorija razvitija buhgalterskogo ucheta. Moskow : Finansy i statistika.

Butynets, F. F. & Horetska, L. L. (2002). Bukhhalterskyi oblik u zarubizhnykh krainakh. Zhytomyr: Ruta.

Volkov, D. L. (2006). Finansovyj uchet: teorija, praktika, otchetnost' organizacii. SPb. : Izdat. dom S.-Peterb. gos. un-ta.

Mizhnarodni standarty finansovoi zvitnosti 2004. (2005). Kyiv: Federatsiia profesiinykh bukhhalteriv i audytoriv Ukrainy.

Holov, S. F., Kostiuchenko, V. M., Kravchenko, I. Yu., Yamborko, H. A. (2005). Finansovyi oblik. Kyiv : Libra.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) «Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information», Statement of Financial accounting Concepts No. 2. (1980). Stamford, CT: FASB.

Ahmad, H. Jumah. (2009). The implications of materiality concept on accounting practices and decision making. Inter Metro Business Journal Spring, 5(1), 22-37.

Accounting standard AASB 1031 «Materiality»: Australian Accounting Standard Board. (2004). Retrieved from: www.aasb.com.au.

Olkhovikova, O. L., Seleznov, O. V., Zienina, O. O., Hyk, O. V., Binder, S. H. (2011). Mizhnarodni standarty kontroliu yakosti, audytu, ohliadu, inshoho nadannia vpevnenosti ta suputnikh posluh. Kyiv : Feniks.

Zakon Ukrainy "Pro audytorsku diialnist" vid 14.09.2006. # 140–V. (2006). Retrieved from: http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua.

Mizhnarodni standarty audytu, nadannia vpevnenosti ta etyky. Vydannia 2007 roku. (2007). Kyiv : Audytorska palata Ukrainy.

Instrukcija o porjadke formirovanija pokazatelej buhgalterskoj otchetnosti: Utverzhdena postanovleniem Ministerstva finansov Respubliki Belarus' 17.02.2004. № 16. (2004). Retrieved from: http://www.lawbelarus.com/repub/sub08/texb5460.htm.

Popel', O. Ju. (2001). Analiticheskie procedury i ih znachenie v audite. Retrieved from: http://www.audit.ru/articles/articlel2.html.

Polozhenie po buhgalterskomu uchetu «Ispravlenie oshibok v buh-galterskom uchete i otchetnosti» (PBU 22/2010): Utverzhdeno prikazom Ministerstva finansov Rossijskoj Federacii ot 28.06.2010. № 63n. (2010). Retrieved from: http://www.eg-online.ru /document/regulatory/107538.

Polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 1 “Zahalni vymohy do finansovoi zvitnosti”. Natsionalni standarty v bukhhalterskomu obliku. Pytannia vykorystannia (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua.

Pro suttievist u bukhhalterskomu obliku i zvitnosti: lyst Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy vid 29.07.2003., # 04230-04108. (2003). Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audit, 8, 59-60.

Published

2014-12-17

Issue

Section

Problems and prospects of development of the information base of economic analysis.

How to Cite

Etymology of concept «significance» in accounting and auditing. (2014). Ekonomichnyy Analiz, 18(2), 23-30. http://econa.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/econa/article/view/691

Similar Articles

1-10 of 191

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.